As the NBA celebrates its 80th anniversary, the debate over who deserves a spot on the expanded Top 80 list is as heated as ever. Personally, I think this exercise isn’t just about stats or accolades—it’s about legacy, impact, and the intangible qualities that define greatness. What makes this particularly fascinating is how it forces us to weigh different eras, positions, and styles of play against each other. In my opinion, the conversation should start with the obvious, but then dive into the gray areas where the real debate lies.
The No-Brainers: Jokić and SGA
Nikola Jokić and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (SGA) are, in my view, the easiest picks. Jokić’s three MVPs and a championship ring make him an undeniable choice. What many people don’t realize is how rare it is for a player to dominate both statistically and culturally the way Jokić has. He’s redefined the modern center, and that alone earns him a spot. SGA, on the other hand, has emerged as a force with two MVPs and a championship. If you take a step back and think about it, his rise from a promising young player to a league MVP is one of the most compelling stories in recent NBA history.
The Contenders: Luka, Tatum, and Howard
This is where it gets tricky. Luka Dončić is a statistical juggernaut, but his lack of a championship is often held against him. From my perspective, Luka’s peak is so high that it’s hard to ignore. He’s already in the conversation for the best player of his generation, and that’s saying something. Jayson Tatum, meanwhile, has a championship and a well-rounded game, but his résumé feels incomplete compared to Luka’s. Dwight Howard, often overlooked, has a case that’s more emotional than statistical. His dominance in the early 2010s and his role in the 2020 Lakers championship shouldn’t be forgotten. A detail that I find especially interesting is how Howard’s career trajectory—from superstar to role player—reflects the evolving nature of the NBA itself.
The Final Four: Who Makes the Cut?
If I had to pick four, I’d go with Jokić, SGA, Luka, and Howard. What this really suggests is that greatness isn’t just about individual achievements but also about how a player fits into the broader narrative of the league. Luka’s statistical dominance, Howard’s peak years, and the cultural impact of Jokić and SGA all contribute to a richer understanding of NBA history. This raises a deeper question: Are we celebrating the players who changed the game, or those who mastered it within its existing framework?
Why This Matters
This isn’t just a list—it’s a reflection of how we value basketball. Personally, I think the NBA’s Top 80 should be more than a collection of stats. It should capture the essence of what makes the league great: the rivalries, the comebacks, the moments that leave us speechless. In my opinion, the players we choose should embody those moments, not just accumulate accolades. After all, what’s the point of greatness if it doesn’t inspire?
